Number of People Employed






Number of People Employed 
Employment in Industries/Services by Groups
Employment  as on 31st March 2012 (in lakh)

Sectors
Agriculture, Hunting, Forestry & Fishing
13.97
Mining & Quarrying
12.13
Manufacturing
65.97
Electricity, gas  & water
8.82
Construction
9.5
Wholesale & Retail Trade and  Restaurant and Hotels
7.69
Transport, Storage & Communication
27.06
Financing, Insurance, Real Estates & Business services
32.76
Community Social & Personal Services
114.82
Total*
292.72



           



















Reliable estimates of employment and unemployment are obtained through labour force surveys conducted by National Sample Survey (NSS) Office, Ministry of Statistics & Programme implementation.  As per latest surveys, 2011-12 the overall workforce in the country is 47.41 crore persons and 52.2 per cent are self-employed, 17.9 per cent are regular/wage salaried and 29.9 per cent are casual labourers.   

            As per information available under Employment Market Information programme of Ministry of Labour and Employment, 2.93 crore persons were employed in public and private sectors under organized sector of Indian economy  as on 31st March 2012.  Detail of sector-wise and State-wise gender wise number of persons  are-
Industries wise employment in organized sector as on 31st March 2012

State-wise employment in organized sector during 2012
Sl. No.
State/Union Territory
As on 31-3-2012
(in lakh)


Men
Women
Total
I.
NORTH ZONE
36.89
7.70
44.59
1
Haryana
6.33
1.17
7.5
2
Punjab
6.67
1.59
8.26
3
Himachal Pradesh
3.17
0.76
3.93
4
Chandigarh
0.84
0.28
1.12
5
Delhi
7.39
1.39
8.78
6
Rajasthan
10.61
2.29
12.9
7
Jammu & Kashmir
1.87
0.23
2.1
II.
CENTRAL ZONE
33.08
5.09
38.17
8
Madhya Pradesh
8.53
1.41
9.94
9
Chattisgarh
19.28
2.79
22.07
10
Uttar Pradesh
2.74
0.48
3.22
11
Uttaranchal
2.51
0.42
2.93
III.
NORTH-EASTERN ZONE
10.43
4.60
15.03
12
Assam
7.51
3.70
11.2
13
Meghalaya
0.43
0.20
0.63
14
Manipur
0.60
0.19
0.79
15
Mizoram
0.10
0.03
0.13
16
Nagaland
0.59
0.19
0.78
17
Tripura
1.20
0.30
1.5
IV.
EASTERN ZONE
41.14
5.23
46.37
18
Bihar
4.04
0.22
4.26
19
Jharkhand
5.96
1.14
7.1
20
Orissa
16.55
2.67
19.22
21
West Bengal
14.58
1.20
15.78
V.
WESTERN ZONE
59.96
13.21
73.17
22
Gujarat
18.84
3.20
22.04
23
Maharashtra
39.76
9.76
49.52
24
Goa
1.21
0.25
1.46
25
Daman & Diu
0.14
0.01
0.15
VI.
SOUTHERN ZONE
53.44
24.63
78.07
26
Andhra Pradesh
15.99
4.29
20.28
27
Karnataka
15.39
7.56
22.95
28
Kerala
6.40
4.49
10.89
29
Pondicherry
0.45
0.13
0.58
30
Tamil Nadu
15.21
8.16
23.37
31
Andaman & Nicobar
0.30
0.08
0.38

TOTAL
235.25
60.54
295.79
Source: D.G.E.& T., M/o Labour & Employment.

This was stated by Shri Bandaru Dattatreya, the Minister of State(IC)  for Labour  and Employment in response to a written question in Rajya  Sabha  yesterday.

****
Exploitation of Migrant Domestic Workers by Placement Agencies 
The Ministry of Labour and Employment has issued guidelines on 30.10.2003 to the State Governments and Union Territory (UT) Administrations to consider regulation of the functioning of Private Placement Agencies. Subsequently, the Ministry requested State and UTs in October 2010, to register placement agencies providing domestic workers specifically under Shops & Establishments Act. Information on placement agencies is not maintained centrally. However, the state governments were also requested to ensure compliance of these guidelines. The Ministry has entrusted a Study on ILO convention 181 regarding Private Placement Agencies to V.V. Giri National Labour Institute. The scope of study includes a gap analysis of existing legal frame work at both National and State level. 


****
Social Security to Unemployed People 
The Government through the Budget Speech, 2015 announced three Social Security Schemes pertaining to the Insurance and Pension Sectors, namely Pradhan Mantri JeevanJyoti Bima Yojana (PMJJBY), Pradhan Mantri Suraksha Bima Yojana (PMSBY) and the Atal Pension Yojana (APY) to move towards creating a universal social security system, focused especially at the poor and the under-privileged. The schemes provide essential and affordable social protection to all citizens in a convenient manner linked to auto-debit facility from bank accounts. These schemes are expected to address the issue of low coverage of life and accident insurance and old age income security in the country.

PMJJBY offers a renewable one year life cover of Rs 2 lakh to subscribing bank account holders in the age group of 18-50 years, covering death due to any reason, for a premium of Rs 330 per annum per subscriber.

PMSBY offers a renewable one year personal accidental death-cum-disability cover to subscribing bank account holders in the age group of 18-70 years for a premium of Rs 12 per annum per subscriber. In this scheme Rs. 2 Lakh is payable on death or permanent total disability and Rs. 1 Lakh on permanent partial disability. Atal Pension Yojana: Under the APY, the subscribers would receive the guaranteed minimum pension of Rs. 1000 per month or Rs. 2000 per month or Rs. 3000 per month or Rs. 4000 per month or Rs. 5000 per month, at the age of 60 years, depending on their contributions, which itself would be based on the age of joining the APY. APY is open to all account holders in the age group of 18 to 40 years.

To create awareness regarding the schemes an exclusive website www.jansuraksha.gov.in has been created by Department of Financial Services, Ministry of Finance which hosts all relevant material / information, including forms, rules etc. related to these schemes.

This was stated by Shri Bandaru Dattatreya, the Minister of State(IC) for Labour and Employment in response to a written question in Rajya Sabha yesterday. 

****
Creation of Employment Opportunities During Five Year Plan 
According to the last 3 National Sample Survey Office (NSSO) surveys, the workforce grew from 39.7 crore in 1999-2000 to 45.91 crore in 2004-05, 46.55 crore in 2009-10 and 47.41 crore persons in 2011-12.

Employment generation is both a cause and consequence of economic growth and is impacted by demographic shifts and technological transformations. For achieving the target of providing employment, Government has taken various steps by generating employment through encouraging private sector of economy, fast tracking various projects involving substantial investment and increasing public expenditure on schemes like Prime Minister’s Employment Generation Programme (PMEGP) run by Ministry of Micro, Small & Medium Enterprises, Mahatma Gandhi National Rural Employment Guarantee Scheme (MGNREGA), Pt. Deen Dayal Upadhyaya Grameen Kaushalya Yojana (DDU-GKY) scheme run by Ministry of Rural Development and National Urban Livelihoods Mission (NULM) run by Ministry of Housing & Urban Poverty Alleviation.

Government has also decided to strategically promote labour-intensive manufacturing and expand employment opportunities by promoting tourism and agro-based industries.

New schemes have also been launched which includes Pradhan Mantri Jan Dhan Yojana, Swatchh Bharat Mission (Gramin) and Seekho aur Kamao scheme was launched for the skill development of minority communities.

These schemes are being implemented nation-wide.

For skilling to provide employment, a new Ministry of Skill Development and Entrepreneurship has been established to coordinate the skill activities across Ministries. In order to improve the employability of youth, around 20 Ministries run skill development schemes across 70 sectors. According to the data compiled by National Skill Development Agency (NSDA), about 51.50 lakh persons were given skill development training in the year 2014-15 under these schemes.

This was stated by Shri Bandaru Dattatreya, the Minister of State(IC) for Labour and Employment in response to a written question in Rajya Sabha yesterday. 

****


Examination for Advocates 

The Bar Council of India conducts the examination, in compliance with the Apex Court’s observation in the SLP No. 22337 of 2008 in the matter of Bar Council of India Vs Bonnie FOI Law Collage & Ors. The purpose and objective of this examination is to set minimum standard for practice of Law in India and assess the candidate’s ability by examining his basic knowledge and analytical ability required to practice law in India. After coming into effect of the All India Bar Examination Rules, 2010, of the Bar Council of India, the Advocates who have obtained LL.B degree in the academic year of 2009-2010 onward and enrolled in the concerned State Bar Council, can practice in the court of Law, after passing this examination. However, the Bar Council of India on the request of various Advocates, relaxed the condition, thereby they are now allowed to practice for two years from the date of enrollment, with a condition that they should pass this examination within two years. 

This information was given by Union Minister of Ministry of Law & Justice, Shri D. V. Sadananda Gowda in a written reply in Lok Sabha today. 

****
Pendency of Cases in Supreme Court 

The pendency of cases in Supreme Court has come down from 62,791 matters as on 01.01.2015 to 61,016 matters as on 29.07.2015. The Approved and Working Strength of Judges in Supreme Court is 31 and 28 respectively; and 3 posts of Judges of Supreme Court are vacant as on 01.08.2015. No study has been conducted by the government in the recent past about pendency of cases in the Supreme court on account of insufficient number of judges. Further, there is no proposal, at present, to increase the strength of Judges of Supreme Court or to increase their retirement age. 

****
Legislation Against Honour Killing 

This Department had sought for the comments/views of the State Governments/Union-territory Administrations on the 242nd Report of the Law Commission titled “Prevention of Interference with the Freedom of Matrimonial Alliances (in the name of Honour and Tradition)”, 2012. Till date, comments/views of 27 States Governments namely, Andhra Pradesh, Arunachal Pradesh, Assam, Chhattisgarh, Goa, Gujarat, Himachal Pradesh, Jharkhand, Karnataka, Kerala, Madhya Pradesh, Meghalaya, Mizoram, Nagaland, Odisha, Punjab, Rajasthan, Uttar Pradesh, Uttarakhand, West Bengal, and all Union territory Administration have been received on the said Report. Responses of remaining State Governments are awaited. 

After considering the comments of all the State Governments/Union-territory Administrations and having wider consultation with the stakeholders, a policy decision to enact the legislation on the subject will be taken. In view of the above, it may not be possible to fix any time frame in this regard. 

This information was given by Union Minister of Ministry of Law & Justice, Shri D. V. Sadananda Gowda in a written reply in Lok Sabha today. 

**** 

Special Courts for Crimes Against Children 

           
            Section 28(1) of the Protection of Children from Sexual Offences Act, 2012 provides that for the purposes of providing a speedy trial, the state Government shall in consultation with the Chief Justice of the High Court, by notification in the official Gazette, designate for each district, a Court of Session to be a Special Court to try the offences under the Act provided that if a Court of Session is notified as a Children’s Court under the Commissions for Protection of Child Right Act, 2005 or a Special Court designated for similar purposes under any other law for the time being in force, then, such court shall be deemed to be a Special Court under this Session. As per these provisions, it is for the State Government to designate the Special Courts. Information on the number of Courts so designated or the number of cases disposed of and pending in these courts is not maintained Centrally. However, as per the reports published by National Crime Records Bureau, the cases reported and conviction rate in respect of crimes against children during the years 2011, 2012 and 2013 are as under:

Crime against children

Year
Number of cases reported
Conviction rate
1
2
3
2013
58224
30.9
2012
38172
29.0
2011
33098
34.6

****
MoU with Other Countries 

           
            The Election Commission of India (ECI) has so far signed Memorandum of Understanding (MoU) with Twenty (20) Election Management Bodies (EMBs) and International organization across the world including the Central Election Commission of Georgia as per details attached at Annexure-A. Generally, the Election Commission of India signs MoU with other EMBs on the basis of its standard MoU. The salient features of every MoU signed with the EMBs of other countries include promotion of exchanges of knowledge and experience in electoral processes; exchange of information, materials, expertise and training of personnel; production and distribution of materials pertaining to electoral systems, voting technology, voters’ education and awareness, and participation of women an minorities in electoral process.

            The MoUs signed by the ECI with the EMBs of other countries pivot around electoral matters including exchange of skills and experience and innovative practices which are of benefit to both the signatories. India is presently regarded as one of the most stable democracies in the comity of nations and free, fair and peaceful elections held periodically at specified intervals to Parliament and State Legislatures have been hailed the world over. Many countries, particularly the developing world, look to the Election Commission of India as the role model and have expressed their desire to share the expertise, experience and best electoral practices of the commission. Such Mutual cooperation between the Election Management Bodies of two democracies goes a long way towards fostering friendly relations with such countries and is beneficial for the evolution of democratic systems and practices in both countries.


Existing MoU with other Electoral Bodies/Organization with Election Commission of India
Annexure-A
Sr.
No.
MoU

Signed date and place
Validity
1.
MoU between the United Nations and the Election Commission of India
28th August, 2004
New Delhi
Indefinite period
2.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Commission Electoral Independent Coted’ lvoire
10th September, 2004
New Delhi
Indefinite period
3.
MoU between the Federal Electoral Institute of the United Mexican States and the Election Commission of India
27th October, 2004
Mexico city
Indefinite period
4.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Election Commission of Bhutan
24th May, 2006 Thimpu
Renewed on 17thSeptember, 2011 in Thimpu
Shall remain in force for the period of (5) five years or unless terminated by either party
5.
MoU between the Election commission of India and Independent Election Commission of Afghanistan
22nd April, 2008
Kabul, Afghanistan
Shall remain in force for the period of (5) five years or unless terminated by either party
6.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Electoral Superior Tribunal of Brazil
14th December, 2010
Brasilia
Indefinite period
7.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Central Election Commission of the Russian Federation
21st December, 2010
New Delhi
Indefinite period
8.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and  Election commission of Nepal
7th June, 2011
Kathmandu, Nepal
Shall remain in force for the period of (5) five years or unless terminated by either party
9.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Electoral Service of Chile
7th July, 2011
Santiago de Chile
Indefinite period
10.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and General Election Commission of Indonesia
16th August, 2011 in Jakarta, Indonesia
Shall remain in force for the period of (5) five years or unless terminated by either party
11.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and Electoral commission of South Africa
11th October, 2011
New Delhi
Indefinite period
12.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and International Foundation for Electoral Systems (IFES)
17th May, 2012
New Delhi
Indefinite period
13.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the National Election Commission of the Republic of Korea
1st August, 2012
New Delhi
Indefinite period
14.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and National Electoral Council of Venezuela
31st August, 2012
Caracas, Venezuela
Shall remain in force for the period of (1) one year or unless terminated by either party
15.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and Supreme Presidential Election Commission of Egypt
18th September, 2012 New Delhi
Shall remain in force for the period of (3) three years or unless terminated by either party
16.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and High National Election commission of Libya
30th November, 2012 New Delhi
Indefinite period
17.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and UNDP
11th October, 2012
New Delhi
Expired
18.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and the Electoral commissioner’s office of Mauritius
11th April, 2013
New Delhi
Shall remain in force for the period of (5) five years or unless terminated by either party
19.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and Supreme Commission for Elections and Referendum of Republic of Yemen
22nd December, 2013
Sana, Yemen
Indefinite period
20.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and central Election commission of Kyrgyzstan
12th July, 2015
Bishkek, Kyrgyzstan
Indefinite period
21.
MoU between the Election Commission of India and Central Election Commission of Georgia
13th July, 2015
New Delhi
Indefinite period


****


No comments

Powered by Blogger.