Exemptions to Private Companies, Govt., Sec.8 and Nidhis
Government issues final notifications
under section 462 of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act) that provide Exemptions
under various provisions of the Act to (i) Private Companies (ii) Government
Companies (iii) Section 8 Companies and (iv) Nidhis
The Ministry of Corporate
Affairs, Government of India issued the final notifications under Section 462
of the Companies Act, 2013 (Act), which provide exemptions under various
provisions of the Act to (i) Private Companies; (ii) Government Companies; (iii)
Section 8 Companies and (iv) Nidhis. The notifications are available at
the Ministry’s website at www.mca.gov.in
For Private Companies, the exemptions relax the provisions for
entering into related party transactions; provide a shorter period for offering
securities to members through right offers; provide for approving issue of
employee stock option plans through a simple majority and allow an easier
procedure and flexibility in holding general meetings. Private companies have
also been allowed to accept deposits from members without the requirement of
offer circular and creation of deposit repayment reserve etc. Flexibility has
also been provided in the types of share capital that can be issued by private
companies. Exemption has been given from filing of board resolutions with the
registry and giving of notice for standing for directorships. Requirement of
mandatory consent of shareholders with regard to certain transactions relating
to sale of undertaking, investments, borrowings etc has been omitted. Further,
OPCs, dormant companies, small companies and private companies having paid up
share capital less than Rs. 100 crore have been excluded for calculating the
limit of 20 companies for audit by an auditor. Private companies not having any
investment by any body corporate have been allowed to extend loans to directors
etc subject to certain conditions relating to bank borrowings and default
thereof. An interested director of a private company can now participate in the
Board meeting after declaring his interest.
Government
Companies have been exempted from the limits pertaining to
managerial remuneration; restriction on maximum number of directorships and
disqualification of directors in certain cases. The provisions in respect of
Nomination and Remuneration Committee have also been relaxed in respect of
their applicability to directors/managerial persons. The provisions relating to
loans to directors; loans and investments by companies and related party
transactions have been modified to provide flexibility to Government companies
in complying with such provisions. The exemption for Government companies to
retain the suffix “Limited” even if incorporated as private limited company,
has been continued as per the exemption available under Companies Act, 1956.
Modifications in the provisions relating to place of holding general meetings
have also been made. Provisions in respect of rotation of directors and
right of persons to stand for directorship are exempted for wholly owned
Government companies. The provisions in respect of forming opinion about
integrity, expertise/experience of independent directors have been modified to
provide flexibility to concerned Ministry/Department. For the Government
companies engaged in producing defence equipment, the provisions of section 186
(loans and investments by companies) and Accounting Standard - 17 (Segment
Reporting) shall not be applicable.
For Charitable Companies the provisions in respect of notice
for general meeting have been modified to enable such companies to save time
and resources in sending notices. The notice for general meeting and financial
statements may be circulated at notice of 14 days instead of 21 days. The
provisions in respect of appointment of independent directors (IDs) and
Nomination and Remuneration Committee will not be applicable to such companies.
The audit committees of such companies need not have Independent Directors. The
restrictions on number of directorships have also been exempted for these
companies. These companies are allowed to hold board meetings once in six
months instead of four meetings in a year, as prescribed for other companies.
These companies have been exempted from provisions requiring notice to be given
for standing for directorship if their articles provide for election of
directors by ballot. Flexibility from the provisions on passing of board
resolutions in a board meeting only and on disclosure and participation in
board meetings by an interested director have also been provided.
In case of Nidhis, provisions
relating to serving of documents to members and payment of dividend have been
modified to provide more flexibility to such companies. Provisions relating to
private placement have been partially relaxed for such companies. These
companies have also been exempted from the requirements of section 62 which
relates to further issue of share capital. The notice amount of Rs. 1
lakh provided under section 160 has been reduced to Rs. 10,000 for these
companies. Provisions of section 185 in respect of loans to directors have been
relaxed for these companies with the condition that loan is given to a director
or his relative in his capacity as member and the disclosure is made in the accounts.
**********
Auction for Sale (Re-Issue) of Government Stocks
The Government of India have announced the Sale (re-issue) of (i) “7.68 per
cent Government Stock 2023” for a notified amount of Rs. 3,000 crore (nominal)
through price based auction, (ii)“7.88 per cent Government Stock
2030” for a notified amount of Rs. 6,000 crore (nominal) through price
based auction, (iii) “7.95 per cent Government Stock 2032” for
a notified amount of Rs.3,000 crore (nominal) through price based
auction, and (iv) “8.17 per cent Government Stock 2044” for a
notified amount of
Rs.3,000 crore (nominal) through price based auction. The auctions will be conducted using multiple price method. The auctions will be conducted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Mumbai Office, Fort, Mumbai on June 12, 2015 (Friday).
Rs.3,000 crore (nominal) through price based auction. The auctions will be conducted using multiple price method. The auctions will be conducted by the Reserve Bank of India (RBI), Mumbai Office, Fort, Mumbai on June 12, 2015 (Friday).
Up
to 5% of the notified amount of the sale of the stocks will be
allotted to eligible individuals and Institutions as per the Scheme for
Non-Competitive Bidding Facility in the Auction of Government Securities.
Both
competitive and non-competitive bids for the auction should be submitted in
electronic format on the Reserve Bank of India Core Banking Solution (E-Kuber)
system on June 12, 2015. The non-competitive bids should be
submitted between 10.30 a.m. and 11.30 a.m. and the competitive
bids should be submitted between 10.30 a.m. and 12.00 noon.
The result of the auctions will be
announced on June 12, 2015 and payment by successful bidders
will be on June 15, 2015 (Monday).
The Stocks will be
eligible for “When Issued” trading in accordance with the guidelines on ‘When
Issued transactions in Central Government Securities’ issued by the
Reserve Bank of India (RBI) vide circular No. RBI/2006-07/178 dated November
16, 2006 as amended from time to time.
*********
CBDT Clarifies Regarding Prosecution of Tax
Evaders;
Effective and Stringent Action only in known and big cases of Tax Evasion to Demonstrate to the Large Number of Compliant Tax Payers that the Tax Laws are just and Fair and to Encourage Voluntary Tax Compliance
Effective and Stringent Action only in known and big cases of Tax Evasion to Demonstrate to the Large Number of Compliant Tax Payers that the Tax Laws are just and Fair and to Encourage Voluntary Tax Compliance
It has been noticed that the certain
section of media have referred to the Discussion Paper, circulated during the
All India Conference of Chief Commissioners and Director Generals of Income Tax
held on 25th-26th May 2015, out of context and stated that the Central Board of
Direct Taxes (CBDT) has told its officers to go beyond raids and searches to
target tax evaders. CBDT clarifies that this is factually not correct. It may
be appreciated that the need of the hour is to provide effective deterrence
since the soft action in extreme and big cases of tax evasion affects the
behaviour of the compliant tax payers. This has been brought out in the latest
study conducted by NIPFP. This is the very aspect that was covered by CBDT in
the discussion during the All India Annual Conference of senior officers.
Effective and stringent action only in known and big cases of tax evasion would
go a long way in demonstrating to the large number of compliant tax payers that
the tax laws are just and fair and also encourage voluntary tax compliance.
It may be worthwhile to mention here that one of the issues for discussion during the All India Conference of Chief Commissioners and Director Generals of Income Tax was ‘Lack of Credible Deterrence through Penalty and Prosecution – Causes and Ways to Improve’. The discussion was within the limited context of cases where action under Section 132 of the IT Act 1961 for search and seizure had been undertaken by the Investigation Division of the Department. These are exceptional cases which are selected for intrusive action after detailed intelligence gathering and due diligence on the basis of credible evidence and are not the norm for routine cases. It may be noted that only 537 searches were conducted in Financial Year 2014-15 in which admitted undisclosed income was to the tune of Rs.10288.05 crore.
In such cases where after intensive fact assessment, the Department undertakes search and seizure action as permissible under the law, mere tax collection does not have deterrence value and these need to be taken to their logical conclusion in terms of levy of penalty and launching of prosecution as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.
It may be worthwhile to mention here that one of the issues for discussion during the All India Conference of Chief Commissioners and Director Generals of Income Tax was ‘Lack of Credible Deterrence through Penalty and Prosecution – Causes and Ways to Improve’. The discussion was within the limited context of cases where action under Section 132 of the IT Act 1961 for search and seizure had been undertaken by the Investigation Division of the Department. These are exceptional cases which are selected for intrusive action after detailed intelligence gathering and due diligence on the basis of credible evidence and are not the norm for routine cases. It may be noted that only 537 searches were conducted in Financial Year 2014-15 in which admitted undisclosed income was to the tune of Rs.10288.05 crore.
In such cases where after intensive fact assessment, the Department undertakes search and seizure action as permissible under the law, mere tax collection does not have deterrence value and these need to be taken to their logical conclusion in terms of levy of penalty and launching of prosecution as per the provisions of the Income Tax Act.
Post a Comment